US Supreme Court Defends Position on Alice, Maintaining/Cementing a Ban on Software Patents Like the Rest of the World

CERT-LatestNews Malware Security News ThreatsCybercrime ThreatsStrategic Uncategorized

Posted in America, Asia, Europe, Patents at 4:46 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

China is probably one of the few countries where ‘pure’ software patents are accepted (for the sake of mass litigation)

China's trolls

Summary: Software patents are a dying breed as the lion’s share of nations will not recognise them (in courts) and the UPC — an intrusion vector for software patents in Europe — is also not happening

LAST night we found out that the US Supreme Court (SCOTUS) won’t be touching any of the cases that can somehow impact Alice, notably the case which only days ago we correctly predicted it would pass on. Section 101 (USPTO), therefore, won’t be changed significantly any time soon. As Patently-O has just put it:

In its first action for the October 2017 term, the Supreme Court has (inter alia) denied Certiorari in three pending Patent Cases:

16-1288 SYNOPSYS, INC. V. MENTOR GRAPHICS CORPORATION
16-1442 ARUNACHALAM V. SAP AMERICA, INC.
16-1427 OLEKSY V. GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.

SCOTUS will not reverse its precedence on software patents any time soon. Software patents are still de facto dead in the US, but the patent microcosm won’t rest in peace.

How about the EPO? Well, currently it’s hard to enforce software patents in Europe because national courts simply say no, and rightly so!

Having said that, the EPO once again pushed the SME lie. It did it again yesterday. It’s an attempt to paint UPC as “good for SMEs” (which is a lie). Also yesterday we saw Penny Gilbert, Peter Damerell and Alex Driver trying to push the UPC with this long article. Someone should explain to Powell Gilbert LLP that the UPC is likely dead (they probably already know that) so that they don’t misinform clients or random readers. The UPC is like a hypothetical project; it’s not even happening and they already leap to it with advice, including the following section about software and business methods:

To what extent can inventions covering software be patented?

Computer programs as such are expressly excluded from patentability, but claims involving computer programs are not excluded if the claimed subject matter has a technical character.

To what extent can inventions covering business methods be patented?

Business methods as such are expressly excluded from patentability. However, like computer programs, business methods may be patentable if the claimed subject matter has a technical character.

As we said quite a few years back, the UPC would be a Trojan horse for software patents in Europe, bypassing national patent laws and enforcing rulings on such patents in pertinent nations in direct contradiction to their laws. We need to stop this.

The EPO appeal boards have long tackled the issue of software patents. I wrote a letter to them (about software patents) almost a decade ago. They’re all about quality control and enforcement of the EPC; in September we saw reports like “Synthon says EPO appeal board has revoked Copaxone API patent” — serving to remind us of the crucial role played by these appeal boards.

Let’s remind ourselves that much of the world now despises and opposes software patents. Laws have accordingly changed, most recently in Australia (we wrote a lot about that last month). In Africa, based on this new article, a company now adopts a terrible strategy by saying “it intends to sharpen its focus on Quiptel’s patented suite of software and technology products and offerings, and also will restructure its content division.”

“Going forward,” it said, “Quiptel’s technology and software patents will now drive the company’s primary business focus.”

Where would they use such patents? Almost no courts would honour such patents anymore. Maybe China? Japan’s courts have become too strict.

Speaking of software patents in Asia, IP Watch has just published this new interview with the Korean IP Commissioner Sung Yunmo. They asked him nothing about software patents which — as we understand it — are sort of banned there. IAM’s Jacob Schindler has this new series about “Patents in Asia” and in it there’s this part about South Korea. Schindler “has reached out to the most trusted patent firms across a range of Asian jurisdictions to prepare the Patents in Asia supplement that follows,” he wrote. “It should serve as a handy reference for chief IP officers over the year to come.”

From the text about South Korea:

To what extent can inventions covering software or computer-implemented inventions be patented?

For a software invention to be granted, certain requirements must be met:

– First, information processing by software should be realised concretely by using hardware (eg, claims should describe involvement of concrete hardware-type components that account for information processing and interaction between them).

– In addition, claims should not involve human activities (as opposed to software processing).

Further, software inventions can be claimed in the form of a method, apparatus, computer-readable medium (storing a computer program) or computer program (stored on a medium). By contrast, claims directed to software, a computer program per se (not stored on a medium) or a program product are not allowed.
To what extent can inventions covering business methods be patented?

Business method inventions are subject to the same requirements as software inventions.

It sounds like more or less the same loopholes which exist in India, New Zealand and Europe. It’s very clear that so-called ‘pure’ software patents are not permitted. That’s just the new reality in the US, too.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.

  • US Supreme Court Defends Position on Alice, Maintaining/Cementing a Ban on Software Patents Like the Rest of the World

    Software patents are a dying breed as the lion’s share of nations will not recognise them (in courts) and the UPC — an intrusion vector for software patents in Europe — is also not happening



  • The Software Patents/Litigation Industry is Dying in the United States and China Takes This Heavy Burden

    A bogus litigation ‘industry’ which merely destroys the software (i.e. real) industry is being scuttled by the Supreme Court; China foolishly enough takes this ‘crown’, essentially creating its own ‘Eastern District of Texas’ in Beijing



  • Death of European Patent Quality: The EPO Officially Sends the Appeal Boards to Exile Despite the UPC Going Nowhere

    Directorate-General 3 (DG3) of the European Patent Office (EPO) is under attack, presumably because Battistelli wants to promote UPC in Paris, but EPO management is lying about it this morning



  • Links 2/10/2017: Linux 4.14 RC3, Claims of GNU/Linux Market Share of 6.91% in September

    Links for the day



  • The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) is Still Defended by Technology Companies and Heckled by Those Who Tax Them

    The great success of inter partes reviews (IPRs), dealt with by the US Patent and Trademark Office’s (USPTO) Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), frightens those who make a living from litigation; we take a closer look at the stance of PTAB opposers and what motivates them



  • Buzzwords Are Used to Patent Software in the US, Courts Continue to Reject These, and Alice is Secure

    Buzzwords such as “AI” continue to pave the way to more bogus patents (USPTO grant numbers soar to new record), but the legal system remains resistant to these and Alice — contrary to some misinformation — isn’t at risk from the US Supreme Court



  • China Advertises Itself as a Friend of Patent Trolls, Google’s Patent Leadership Headless

    The Chinese are becoming a lot more plaintiffs-friendly while at the same time granting an incredible amount of low-quality patents, paving the way to the same chaos the United States is trying to move away from



  • Battistelli’s Club Med at the EPO – Part V: Portugal’s “Golden Visa” Scheme for Angolan Nationals

    Some new revelations about Portugal’s “Golden Visa” scheme — a subject which has been circulating in the news in recent weeks



  • How Tribes in America Have Fallen for a “Scam” That Now Facilitates Patent Trolls

    Three Affiliated Tribes are now being used as a proxy of a patent troll, which is trying hard to avoid proper scrutiny of the patents it is using



  • Trolling Conglomerates MPEG-LA and Fortress Are Plotting to Start Another Round of Patent Shakedowns

    Updates regarding MPEG-LA and Fortress, some of the world’s worst when it comes to raiding competitors (of clients) using patents



  • Apple is the Next BlackBerry

    BlackBerry continues going down the route of ‘monetising’ its patents rather than actually making phones — something towards which even Apple increasingly gravitates



  • Battistelli’s Club Med at the EPO – Part IV: The Angolan Patent Office (IAPI) Seems Almost Defunct

    IAPI, the Angolan authority in charge of patents, turns out to be what we in the UK call “dodgy as Hell” (or worse words than “Hell”)



  • Jesper Kongstad’s Last Day is Today, But the EPO Remains a Sordid Mess Like the UPC

    More high-level EPO staff leaving; the outlook, however, does not look promising, for nothing suggests a change of direction or strategy



  • Links 30/9/2017: Kubernetes 1.8, Linux 6-Year LTS, Wine 2.18 Released

    Links for the day



  • Battistelli’s Club Med at the EPO – Part III: Angola and the Portuguese “Laundromat”

    This part looks at allegations that the former colony Angola is exporting corruption back to Portugal



  • EPO Staff Representatives Help Prevent Seventh Suicide Under Benoît Battistelli

    The utterly bad working atmosphere at the EPO has almost just led to another suicide; the person in question is now in hospital



  • Links 29/9/2017: Krita 3.3.0, Tails 3.2, Amos Yee is Free

    Links for the day



  • Battistelli’s Club Med at the EPO – Part II: António Campinos, Benoît Battistelli and the Angolan Connection

    Background information about the recent trend towards “validation agreements” with non-European developing countries



  • Microsoft is Doing to ‘Open Source’ (OSI) What it Did to W3C

    The corporate/mainstream media keeps telling us that Microsoft has changed and can now be trusted within its competition, but this media merely plays along with an expensive PR campaign which is intended to shift attention and systematically launder Microsoft’s reputation



  • The Effects of ILO and the EPO on Disability

    A bunch of tweets with documents in them, berating both ILO and the EPO for mistreatment and further harm to EPO workers with disabilities



  • The EPO Continues to Lie About the UPC and About SMEs, Even Several Times Per Day Now

    The extent of the EPO’s distortion of facts and misrepresentation of stakeholders keeps peaking, with lies ranging from patent quality to desirability of the UPC



  • European Patent Expired, But $70,000,000 in ‘Damages’

    Injunctions and other legal actions turn out to be useful for companies like Amgen, but what about ordinary European companies?



  • EPO Now a Megaphone of IP Europe, a Front Group of Patent Maximalists

    In a desperate effort to restore so-called ‘demand’ for patents and for the UPC, the EPO now pretends to speak for SMEs (but it’s lying about the views of SMEs)



  • The Unitary Patent (UPC) is Now Rotting in Ireland

    It is now the Republic of Ireland, one of the few countries in the EU which use English, that has its prime minister discovering doubts about the UPC and shelving the UPC referendum



  • Links 27/9/2017: Birthday of GNU

    Links for the day



  • Battistelli Follows German Law Only When It Suits Him, Three Holidays Just Canceled

    EPO workers can wave goodbye to Corpus Christi and All Saints’ Day, not just Reformation Day



  • Links 26/9/2017: Ataribox runs GNU/Linux, Firefox Quantum, Microsoft Pays OSI

    Links for the day



  • EPO Lies About the UPC, Violations of Human Rights, and ‘Green’ European Patents

    The charm offensives of the EPO’s management have become ever more desperate and detached from reality — to the point where even the EPO’s Chief Economist Yann Ménière is acting like a marketing stooge



  • Dying Computer Giants Turn Patents Into an Extortion Racket

    The Palo Alto, California-based HP Inc. (Hewlett-Packard), whose revenue and operating income are sinking (staff also laid off), sends patents to China while IBM continues to drum up software patents while blackmailing rivals with these



  • Microsoft Brings Its GNU/Linux-Hostile Patent Scheme to China

    Microsoft reiterates its intention to only offer ‘protection’ (or indemnification) for GNU/Linux users who pay Microsoft monthly fees while going further and hinting that it may send additional patents to trolls


  • http://techrights.org/2017/10/03/software-patents-scotus/