UPC Puff Piece in the Scottish Media is Just an Advertisement by Marks

CERT-LatestNews Malware ThreatsActivists ThreatsStrategic

Posted in Deception, Europe, Patents at 5:42 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

When moneyed interests dominate the media

Marks & Clerk

Summary: Advertising in the form of an ‘article’ (complete with self-serving bias and falsehoods) in The Scotsman today, courtesy of Team UPC

Marks & Clerk is a large firm, apparently large enough to also occupy the media. Over the years we have shown how the EPO corrupted the media (paying it money) and noted that patent law firms totally dominated coverage about patents, either directly (as authors) or indirectly (quoted extensively by authors, usually to the exclusion of those actually impacted). It’s the same problem in the US media, where the patent office gradually improves.

“It’s hard not to get bitter when stuff like this is done so routinely, basically routing around the public.”Not much can be done about this except openly complain about it. This morning (or last night), filed under “opinion”, the Scottish media published pure spam, not journalism, attempting to sell services rather than inform the public. It’s marketing packaged up as “news” and the promotional final words of this ‘article’ say: “If the UK was to end up outside of the Unitary Patent regime, Marks & Clerk LLP would still be able to apply for Unitary Patents for its clients via its offices in Europe.”

Is this what major news [sic] papers have sunk to? Even national press, not just local media? Suffice to say, being an ‘article’ (informecial) from Marks & Clerk, it paints UPC as desirable in spite of opposition from British software firms. It’s hard not to get bitter when stuff like this is done so routinely, basically routing around the public.

‘David Moreland is a Chartered (UK) and European Patent Attorney for Marks & Clerk,” it says. They are proponents of software patents, which isn’t at all surprising (all of Team UPC is promoting these too and the UPC is a Trojan horse for this agenda).

Here are some excepts:

Will our relationship with the EPO change when we’re no longer part of the EU? Contrary to misconceptions, the EPO is not an EU institution. It has EU members amongst its signatory countries, but there are non-members too – Switzerland, for example.

Companies which have patents granted by the EPO then need to have those patents validated in each country in which they want protection.

[…]

But now there is a new spanner in the works. An anonymous party has recently filed a case with the German Constitutional Court which essentially suggests ratifying the agreement would be against the German constitution. The German Constitutional Court has determined that on the face of it, the challenge is not entirely without merit, and asked the German President to delay signing the implementing legislation for the Unified Patent Court and Unitary Patent court. This ensures that ratification does not take place before a full determination of the constitutionality of the legislation has been made. Whether the complaint is upheld remains to be seen; however any attempt to block the legislation will, at the very least, delay it.

They keep using the word “delay” as if, without even knowing the nature of the complaint and where it came from, they are already certain about the outcome. That’s what Team UPC just keeps doing to bias the outcome.

When will we finally see some real journalism about the UPC? We last wrote about utter lack of it in British media only about 24 hours ago.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.

  • UPC Puff Piece in the Scottish Media is Just an Advertisement by Marks & Clerk

    Advertising in the form of an ‘article’ (complete with self-serving bias and falsehoods) in The Scotsman today, courtesy of Team UPC



  • From East to West and Even Down South at the Eastern District of Texas Patent Trolls Are Losing Everything

    Patent trolls that are accustomed to friendly judges, typically in the Eastern District of Texas, will be circling down the drain if the trend of “fee award” (to the vindicated defendant) continues



  • Those Who Endlessly Attacked Michelle Lee Now Attack Supporters of PTAB, Not Just PTAB

    Watchtroll, which combats patent progress by character assassination of instrumental figures, continues in its warpath today



  • In the Face of Malicious Lobbying, High Tech Inventors Alliance (HTIA) and Computer and Communications Industry Association (CCIA) Protect PTAB

    A new push by the patent microcosm to eliminate PTAB and marginalise Section 101 (which helps suppress software patents) is quickly met with opposition from concerned politicians and groups that represent actual technology companies



  • Weakening of Patents Assigned to Google and Another New Patent Lawsuit Against Uber

    Project Loon patent canceled, Google’s lawsuit against Uber gets ‘diluted’ by 75%, and Uber faces a new lawsuit in the Eastern District of Texas (capital of patent trolls)



  • After the ‘Fall’ of Texas, Patent Trolls Struggle and Some Are on the Retreat

    Things are getting out of hand for patent trolls, which find themselves on the defensive (from challenges to all their patents) and try to escape the cases they started in order to dodge paying fees (to no avail)



  • Immersion, FitBit, Jawbone, and Creative Chose to be a Pile of Patents Rather Than Real Companies

    FitBit is the latest company to be slapped by Immersion (having already driven Jawbone out of business) and there’s news about Creative, which uses old patents to shake down Apple and Android OEMs



  • Debate About Software Patentability in India Still Dominated by Patent Lawyers Rather Than Software Developers

    The warped debate in English-speaking media gives the impression that India should open the door to software patents even though it’s perfectly clear that such patents would harm India’s interests



  • Links 16/7/2017: Mesa 17.1.5, FreeBSD 11.1 RC3

    Links for the day



  • Serious Factual Errors in UPC Coverage at Science|Business and Lack of Coverage in the General Media

    With much of the British media already paid by the EPO to produce UPC puff pieces, we continue to see poor coverage on the topic (if any at all)



  • Guest Post: Is Germany’s UPC Ratification Postponement Related to Problems at the  EPO?

    A question currently being asked by some people watching UPC developments in Germany: “Is Germany’s UPC ratification postponement related to problems at the EPO?”



  • Amazon is Stockpiling Terrible Patents and Using These for Competitive Advantage

    Demonstrating the real purpose of patent hoards, Amazon too ‘pulls a Microsoft’ and shields its dominance by an atmosphere of sheer fear



  • Microsoft-Owned LinkedIn is Ramping Up Software Patents Pursuits, Maybe Lawsuits

    A quick look at some of the patterns and priorities when it comes to Microsoft’s patent strategy, which typically involves coercion, extortion and sometimes (when coercion or extortion fail) litigation



  • European Commission Betrays the Public by Promoting Software Patents

    Software patents named by the European Commission as a given rather than challenged in line with everything that the Parliament, EPC, and European public generally insist on



  • Science|Business Quotes Michel Barnier, Then Speculates Battistelli’s Way to Promote Erroneous Perception of UPC Inevitability

    Éanna Kelly of Science|Business publishes some direct quotes from Barnier, but then goes further by reinforcing false belief that UPC is just a matter of time and only minor technical details are up for debate



  • Links 14/7/2017: KDE Ships KDE Applications 17.04.3, Toward Go 2

    Links for the day



  • “EPO Enlarged Board of Appeal Has Brought an Unprecedented Level of Certainty to the Law,” But Benoît Battistelli Crushes It

    The systematic erosion of patent quality at the EPO, including attacks on the appeal boards, means less patent justice in the rest of Europe, even in the Supreme Court of Britain



  • Michel Barnier, Once a Leading Proponent of UPC, No Longer Certain the UK Can Fit in or That UPC Will Happen

    The United Kingdom’s desire to be leaving the European Union challenges the very existence of the Unified Patent Court (UPC), as even negotiators with vested interests care to admit



  • Links 13/7/2017: Systemd 234, Fedora 27 Plans

    Links for the day



  • Status and Potency of European Patents Compromised

    The European Patents — once renowned for their high quality — see certainty lowered and the process associated with granting increasingly questioned



  • As Expected, Benoît Battistelli Shaved off Billions of Euros Worth of ‘Value’ From European Patents and Thus Alienated Stakeholders

    Overpatenting at the European Patent Office (EPO) means that a lot of patents granted by the EPO are of little or no value, rendering the whole pool of patents questionable until proven otherwise (e.g. in a court of law)



  • Looking Forward to a Battistelli-less and Kongstad-less European Patent Office

    With new top-level leadership at the European Patent Office (EPO) — as envisioned for the middle of next year — people wonder aloud what might happen next



  • Links 12/7/2017: Fabric 1.0, Wine Staging 2.12, Exo 0.11.4

    Links for the day



  • The European Patent Office (EPO) Under Benoît Battistelli is Compared to “Soviet Times”

    The staff of the EPO explains — albeit anonymously for obvious reasons — what it feels like to work for the European Patent Office under Battistelli and why people are afraid to exercise their rights (as these are patently being violated by Battistelli as a matter of routine)



  • The EPO Should Throw Away All Software Patents in the Same Way It Threw Away Patents on Plants and Animals

    The ongoing pretense that it’s acceptable to grant software patents at the EPO needs to end before there’s too big an avalanche of invalidated patents — i.e. patents that should never have been granted in the first place



  • In an Age of Mass Deception by Team UPC Benjamin Henrion (FFII) to Deliver a Talk About UPC and Software Patents

    A look at some of the latest UPC spin and an upcoming talk about the dangers of the UPC, especially to (but not limited to) the software industry



  • Links 11/7/2017: Wayland Protocols 1.9 and Fedora 26 Released

    Links for the day



  • Subtle Shaming of EPO Staff by EPO Management Earlier Today

    How a popular strike against the management of the EPO got spun as improvement in the social climate



  • Links 10/7/2017: Fedora 26 is Coming, Debian 9 ‘Stretch’ Reviewed

    Links for the day



  • Lobbying Against the US Supreme Court’s Landmark Decision (Alice) by Bristows, IBM, David Kappos, IPO, ABA, AIPLA, Adam Mossoff and Kevin Madigan

    Using paid-for lobbyists and influence that’s up for sale, companies such as IBM set up events and initiatives to compel politicians to change Section 101, gut patent progress, and basically give patent aggressors a free rein


  • http://techrights.org/2017/07/17/team-upc-in-scottish-media/

    Tagged